www.thesuniljain.com

UPA can go ahead if it wants PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 22 March 2013 02:35
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

From diesel hikes to clearing projects, a large number of  reforms don't need any legislative sanction

Going by the way the stock markets continue to tank, not too many investors seem to be buying the finance minister’s assurance that, regardless of the DMK’s exit, it will be business as usual. Nor should they since, given the large differences between the UPA’s outside supporters—the BSP and the SP—and their stated positions on various Bills like the insurance and pension ones, it doesn’t look likely the UPA is going to be able to get much of its legislative agenda through. And that’s assuming the government lasts its full term—the CBI raids on DMK party treasurer MK Stalin suggest this could be an uphill task. The fact that, after rising in January and February, FII flows have turned negative over the past two days confirms this—as compared to $24.37 billion in all of 2012, India got $8.64 billion in January and February this year, and just $1.5 billion in the first 20 days of this month.

That said, it’s important to put things in perspective. It is difficult to believe, for instance, that events such as Cyprus are not influencing the Sensex—after opening at 18926 yesterday, the market rose to 19082 and then tanked to 18793 in sync with European markets that fell with the Plan Bs for Cyprus not looking much better than the original. How much of the collapse is Cyprus and how much the DMK is difficult to say, but the Cyprus effect can’t be insubstantial.

Similarly, while there is little doubt investments have stalled, some perspective is a good idea. Data from CMIE, for instance, shows the value of stalled projects is up from R1,50,000 crore in FY05 to over R8,00,000 crore by December FY13; the value of fresh project announcements, similarly, is down from a high of R22,00,000 crore in FY09 to a mere R4,00,000 crore in December FY13. The order books data for capital goods firms tells you a similar story of falling growth, as does the sale of heavy and medium commercial vehicles. From the point of view of actual investments on the ground, similarly, gross fixed capital formation is down from the heady 34.5% of GDP levels of Q2FY08 to about 28.7% in Q3FY13 (see charts).

But, and here’s the important point to keep in mind: even at these levels, gross fixed capital formation, as measured by the CSO, was still R7,55,466 crore in Q3FY13, up around R80,000 crore from a year ago—and the figure in Q3FY12 was around R40,000 crore higher than Q3FY11. None of this is to say investments are looking healthy, but merely to point out the bottom hasn’t yet fallen out of the investments market—and that’s why the Sensex is still at 18793, and not 15000. Despite all the uncertainty, the market is still trading at 12.8 times projected 12-month profits as compared to the MSCI emerging markets index’s 10.5 times.

After a while, it is obvious, if stalled projects don’t get cleared or new projects announced, the gross fixed capital formation will fall. But this is where what the finance minister said about reforms not stopping comes in. Without a majority in Parliament, the government cannot introduce, much less hope to pass, Bills like those increasing FDI limits in insurance or pensions. But there are a host of actions that are purely administrative in nature, that do not require any Parliament approval.

Top on the list, for instance, is reduction in petroleum subsidies. The decision to eliminate the subsidy on bulk sales of diesel or to raise prices of retail diesel by 45-50 paise per litre each month is not something that needs Parliament approval—nor can it be the case that the Congress party’s allies were in favour of it. This was a decision taken by the government after P Chidambaram returned to the finance ministry and, as such, is unaffected by the DMK pulling out.

No Bill was brought in Parliament, similarly, to raise Railway fares prior to the Railway Budget; nor does any Bill need to be brought to Parliament to, for instance, privatise the New Delhi Railway Station and convert it into a swank global-style multi-storeyed station with hotels, shopping malls and office buildings—this is what the government did with the Delhi Airport some years ago. Clearing the R8,00,000 crore of stalled projects CMIE talks of, similarly, doesn’t need the support of alliance partners—the defence ministry, which is headed by a Congressman and the environment ministry headed by a Congresswoman, for instance, are holding up most of these projects. Whether the reasons are valid or not is not the point, the point is they are not controlled by alliance partners.

The problem, or the solution if you like, lies in the fact that, by and large, the UPA’s reform or anti-reforms agenda has emanated from the Congress party, not the allies. The Food Security Bill—which, fully implemented, can play havoc with the fisc and which the Food Corporation of India is not in a position to implement—was not the idea of an alliance partner, it was the brainchild of the Congress Party. The Right to Education Bill, which seeks closure of all unrecognised schools if they don’t conform to norms within a period of 3 years, was a Congress idea. Ditto for the Homestead Bill that is in the drafting. Whether it is getting defence minister AK Antony to clear oil exploration or petroleum minister Veerappa Moily allowing oil PSUs to hike prices in keeping with what the Cabinet has cleared, all of these are decisions that can be taken if the Congress party is in favour of them. Fixing the telecom mess (more in a later column) is another reform totally in the Congress party’s hands, as is advancing the PSU divestment calendar or offering attractive discounts on them—watch how this changes the FII mood. Whether the Congress party has the appetite for getting things fixed—apart from the diesel hike, what’s been outlined is hardly “reform”—is really the question.

 
 

You are here  : Home Goverment UPA can go ahead if it wants