Labour aristocracy PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 28 February 2012 09:16
AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Unions control 2% of workforce, but call the shots


Given today could be the first ever joint strike by all central trade unions, it’s not surprising the Prime Minister is going all out to try and stop it. He has called the Indian National Trade Union Congress president Sanjeeva Reddy and the PMO is holding talks with the labour secretary. For what it’s worth, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee has threatened employees in her state who want to go on strike by saying it will be considered a break in their service—trade unions, on their part, have dismissed this as ridiculous since workers are entitled to take leave. Not surprisingly, in such situations, different unions are using the strike to push their own agenda—bank unions, for instance, are opposing bringing in new players though one of the public demands is to ensure banks do their best to recover bad loans. While the major demand of the trade unions is to prevent casualisation of the workforce, it is important to get some perspective on it.

For one, with trade union membership restricted to less than 2% of the 450-million strong workforce, trade unions are anxious to spread their wings—witness the wave of strikes, often violent, in areas that don’t have much of a history of unionism and, like the auto industry, even pay good wages. While the unions have a legitimate right to want to expand membership, it needs to be kept in mind that labour policies are determined by trade, not government. If Chinese workers are more efficient than Indian ones, the only way to stop Chinese imports from flooding the market is to reduce wage levels in India—since wages of permanent employees, often union members, can’t be reduced, the only way to do this is for India Inc to hire more temporary workers at lower salaries. This also gives firms the much-needed flexibility in organising production. Studies show that greater trade competition leads to increasing casualisation of the workforce and that states with more union-friendly policies tend to have the slowest employment growth. This is the choice before India’s workforce—falling for the rhetoric of the labour aristocracy or worrying about more employment for themselves. Given the last five years have seen the highest ever increases in real wages—12.8% per year for salaried women workers in rural areas for instance—the choice before labour seems pretty clear.


You are here  : Home Miscellaneous Labour aristocracy
intalk.eu - This website is for sale! - intalk Resources and Information.