STEP on it PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 06 December 2013 00:30
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Finmin objection to tied Japanese aid trips DMICDC

As projects go, the Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corporation’s (DMICDC) R3,25,000 crore project to build 24 cities is one of the most ambitious India has seen in recent times. What makes it more attractive, however, is that unlike many other projects especially in today’s uncertain times, many of DMICDC’s projects are ready to go. In September, for instance, DMICDC’s board cleared 9 projects worth R1,20,000 crore—these are projects for which the land has been acquired, where the master planning has been done and top global consultants, one of whom was in charge of the London Olympics, have been hired to put together the projects. The seven states that make up the DMICDC—Delhi, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Haryana—have also come up, or are coming up, with special legislation to help the cities come up. The cities, which are to be built through a central-state government partnership are to be financed in an interesting manner—the state will provide the land as its share of each SPV’s equity, the centre will provide the funds for master planning and creating some initial trunk infrastructure and, as the trunk infrastructure gets built up, the land alongside it will be sold to finance the rest of it.

What can trip up the project, however, is the finance ministry’s objection to the Japanese government’s $4.5 billion aid for the initial part of the project along terms that are similar to those for the 1,500km Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) from Dadri to the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust. Under the terms of what is called a Special Terms for Economic Partnership (STEP) loan, at least 30% of the total value of contracts has to be procured from Japan. Under normal circumstances, objecting to the aid as being ‘tied’ is valid, but this needs to be weighed against the advantages that this tied aid gives. An untied yen loan, and that’s assuming that this would be available from Japan, typically involves an interest rate of 1.4%, a moratorium of 10 years and a repayment period of 30 years. A STEP loan, on the other hand, has an interest rate of a much lower 0.1%, the same grace period but a repayment period of 40 years. While the government must examine whether a tied project results in higher costs—a good place to start is the DFC where the Western corridor is financed by STEP and the Eastern corridor by the World Bank—and to then compare it with the benefits in terms of the lower-cost finance. According to the Japan International Cooperation Agency which is funding a third of the $4.5 billion loan for DMICDC, the cost of the STEP works out to a third lower than the non-STEP loan. In which case, the metric to examine is whether having to procure 30% of the project from Japanese firms will outweigh the benefits.



You are here  : Home Infrastructure/Urbanisation STEP on it